top of page

U.S. – Greenland Crisis: A Transatlantic Crisis Driven by Grievance and Geopolitics

In recent weeks, tensions have increased between the United States and several allied countries following public statements by President Donald Trump regarding Greenland. Trump has linked renewed U.S. interest in Greenland to his response to not receiving the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize, a connection that has drawn attention from policymakers and observers. These statements have prompted diplomatic discussions among transatlantic partners and raised questions about alliance coordination and policy alignment.


Greenland: Size, Significance and U.S. Interest


Greenland, although small in population, has an immense strategic value. Situated between North America and Europe with proximity to Russia and the Arctic's untapped natural resources, Greenland has become a focal point of great-power competition. For decades, the U.S. has maintained a defense presence on the island. 


Historically, U.S. leaders have floated the idea of buying Greenland from Denmark. During his first term as Trump pursued such an acquisition in 2019, however this proposal was rejected by Denmark emphasizing the territory is not for sale. 


The Nobel Peace Prize Connection 


In 2025, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Maria Corina Machado, a Venezuelan opposition politician and activist. Following the announcement, President Trump sent a message to Norway’s Prime Minister expressing criticism over the decision. According to reporting by NPR, Trump stated that he no longer felt an obligation to focus exclusively on peace and would instead pursue what he described as U.S. national interests, referencing Greenland in that context.



The U.S. Escalation: Tariffs and Territory Claims 


Recently, President Trump reiterated his Greenland stance with a series of economic measures. On Saturday January 17, Trump announced a 10% tariff on imports from eight European nations: Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and the UK. These tariffs will go into effect on February 1, 2026 and will raise to 25% beginning on June 1, 2026 if a deal is not agreed upon. 


Policy analysts note that the proposed measures link trade policy with broader diplomatic discussions involving U.S. allies. Such use of tariffs in the context of a territorial dispute involving NATO member states is uncommon and has prompted debate among policymakers and observers.


European Responses 


Denmark and Greenland have firmly rejected any notion that Greenland could be sold or transferred outside of its current framework. Denmark reaffirms that Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark. Any change in sovereignty would involve Greenland’s self determination. 


In diplomatic councils across Europe, there is a sense of urgency to deescalate. Some leaders have urged toward negotiation, while others have warned that the economic threats risk damaging the broader transatlantic alliance. 


Protest in front of U.S. Consulate in Nuuk, Greenland via PBS News by Marko Djurica/Reuters
Protest in front of U.S. Consulate in Nuuk, Greenland via PBS News by Marko Djurica/Reuters

Diplomatic Risks: NATO, Trust, and Alliance Integrity 


The U.S.-Greenland dispute represents more than an isolated territorial controversy, rather it exposes structural vulnerabilities within NATO’s political cohesion and raises serious concern about trust amongst allies. 


At the heart of NATO lies a fundamental premise of collective defense amongst sovereign nations. Even without an explicit threat of military action, the refusal to rule out force, combined with economic coercion undermines NATO’s political foundation. If alliance members begin to perceive that NATO’s strongest power may leverage its power against them, rather than for collective security, the alliance’s deterrence credibility weakens. 


The Risk of a Transatlantic Rift 


The debate over Greenland is more than just a remote territorial dispute; it serves as a stress test for the foundations of Western alliances. With tariffs looming, diplomatic ties fraying and public rhetoric escalating, the Greenland crisis risks leaving a lasting mark on transatlantic cooperation. 


Sources:


  • AP News, “Trump’s Greenland threats spark outrage from EU and test longtime NATO alliance.” 

    January 20. Link

  • NPR, “Trump says he’s pursuing Greenland after receiving Nobel Peace Prize snub.”January 20. Link

  • Reuters, “Trump links Greenland threat to Nobel Peace Prize snub, EU prepares to retaliate.” January 20.Link




bottom of page